Friday 30 September 2016

Edo Governorship Election: Kudos To IGP Ibrahim Idris



By Adewole Kehinde

The governorship election that took place on Wednesday 28th September, 2016 in Edo State was a huge feat when you talk of the security arrangement put in place.

The Inspector General of Police, IGP Ibrahim Idris had visited Edo State on Friday 9th September, 2016 ahead of governorship election to seek the cooperation of Stakeholders for a peaceful election and the visit really contributed to the non-violent governorship election we witnessed in the State.

It will be recalled that in his determination to ensure that the rescheduled Edo Gubernatorial Election is conducted in a peaceful and secured atmosphere, the Inspector General of Police had ordered the galvanization of the reviewed operation plan for the governorship election that held throughout the State on Wednesday, 28th September, 2016.

A total of 25,000 Police officers were deployed across the State to ensure peace and security during the polls. The election security process paid off as it guaranteed the free, fair and credible governorship election we witnessed in Edo State.

The electoral process was well secured; eligible voters exercised their rights freely without intimidation, election materials and officials were well protected and above all, no single soul was lost during the election.  

In the same manner, protection of life and property in Edo State were duly secured while the slight protest at the INEC office and some spots in Edo State was put under control by the Nigeria Police with support from other sister security agencies on ground.

The Police officers deployed for the election really conducted themselves in the best professional manner, maintaining apolitical disposition and strictly stood by the rules of engagement.  

The entire Nigeria Policemen that were deployed to Edo State discharged their statutory functions effectively, unbiased and in accordance to the principles of democratic policing and I must commend them for that.

On the security arrangement for the election, the APC Chairman, John Odigie-Oyegun, described it as lovely.  “Well, I’m National Chairman of the party and it was something that was of grave concern for us all the time. All the security agencies have given us iron clad assurance that there will be no incident, at least, no major incident.”

Above all, I must commend the man that laid the foundation for this Peace and Tranquility in Edo State that has led to the free, fair and credible election. That is the Inspector General of Police, IGP Ibrahim Idris for keeping to his promise of providing an atmosphere of Peace and Safety to all residents of Edo State.

It is on record that IGP Ibrahim Idris attended Joint Police and Military courses, including Disaster Management Course at the Armed Forces Command and Staff College Jaji in 2003; he was also the Director, International Peace Keeping Office at the Nigeria Police Force Headquarters from 11th April 2011 to 6th July 2011. All these must have contributed to the peaceful and rancour-free governorship election in Edo State.

As a man of Peace, in March 2011, the President of Democratic Republic of Timor Leste, Dr Jose Ramos Horta (Nobel Lauret) awarded IGP Ibrahim Idris the Country’s highest National Medal, the “Medal of Merit”, for his contribution to the Security and Stability of Timor Leste.

The UN Secretary General appointed Mr. Ibrahim as a Police Commissioner in UNAMID, in Darfur. This is the 1st time a Nigerian Police officer was clinching a B2 position for any UN Mission in the World. However, he declined the offer to enable him contribute his quota in ensuring Peace and Stability during and after the 2015 General Elections which he did perfectly in Kano State.

The residents of Ondo and especially Rivers State, where elections will come up before the end of the year; can be assured of violent-free elections, to be conducted in an atmosphere of peace and water tight security arrangement which will be put in place by the Nigeria Police in collaboration with other sister security outfit.

Lastly, Nigerians should be assured of adequate security in our electoral process as the foundation for a rancour-free election has been laid in Edo State by the Inspector General of Police, IGP Ibrahim Idris.   



Adewole Kehinde is a Journalist and Public Affairs Analyst based in Abuja. He can be reached via kennyadewole@gmail.com   

Thursday 29 September 2016

Is Amnesty International Flinging For Anarchy In Nigeria?



"There are no journalistic ethics that transcend the value of human life. There are none. In a situation where you can save a human life, you must. There isn't any conflict in my mind". Sebastian Junger

By Kelvin Adegbenga

My attention has been drawn to the press release by Amnesty International dated Wednesday 28 September 2016 tagged “Crackdown On Journalists And Assault On Protests Shrinking Civic Space”.

I would have ignored the press release because to me, I now see Amnesty International as an arm of the opposition to the Change Agenda in Nigeria.

Amnesty International claimed that security forces are detaining Journalists and bloggers; disrupting peaceful protests to crush dissent and suffocate freedom of expression. I disagree with Amnesty International on these allegations.

In objective Journalism, stories must be balanced in the sense of attempting to present all sides of a story. Fairness means that a journalist should strive for accuracy and truth in reporting, and not slant a story so a reader draws the reporter’s desired conclusion.

Has Amnesty International found it fit to know the reasons why some Journalists and Bloggers are detained? Are fairness and balance achieved only when all of the disparate pieces of a breaking news story are consolidated and organized into a coherent whole? What of the damage done in the interim?

I strongly differ with the latest Amnesty International press release that Nigerian government appears determined to crush dissent and suffocate freedom of expression.

The relevant authorities have always ensured that the rights of Nigerians to freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of expression, as guaranteed by international human rights law and the Nigerian Constitution is non-negotiable but any group or body that want to embark on gathering must inform the relevant authorities to avoid touts taking over such gathering.  

Why do Amnesty International always see violent assault on the side of the security forces and close her eyes on the side of the protesters? Are the security forces not human being? Are their Rights not guaranteed by international human rights law and the Nigerian constitution?  

Let me begin with the protest by members of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) in Abuja on 22 September, 2016. Did the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) notify the security forces of their protest? Did Amnesty International know that the same group protests in Kaduna State resulted in loss of lives and properties?

For the information of Amnesty International, Sheikh Ibrahim Al-Zakzaky, is in custody of the security forces for the safety of his life and that of his immediate family. The issue that Sheikh Ibrahim Al-Zakzaky has been in detention without trial since December 2015 is groundless.

The Bring Back Our Girls Movement have been embarking on peaceful protest from that past administration but the march to Aso Rock Presidential Villa on 6th September, 2016 to demand that the government do more to secure the release of Chibok schoolgirls abducted by Boko Haram over two years ago became violent because the group disrupted movement of those going to their offices especially civil servants working at the Federal Secretariat which is adjacent to the President Villa. I, as much as I support peaceful protest, I am against it when it disturb innocent people going to their places of work.    

On the issue of “of Biafran independence”, is Amnesty International telling us indirectly that they are in support of Nigeria break up despite out peaceful co-existence? The scores of supporters of Biafran independence who are in detention broke the law of peaceful protest and they are facing the Law already. My advice to the Amnesty International is to take their legal representation at the Law Court, if they are so concerned about them.

Fortunately for Amnesty International, since they have documented cases of arrest, enforced disappearance and killing of supporters and members of various pro-Biafran groups in the region, so they can go ahead to sue the Government for violations of their Rights as enshrined in the 1999 Nigeria Constitution.   

Amnesty said that publisher Emenike Iroegbu was arrested in the presence of his family over alleged defamation. Did Emenike Iroegbu defamed or not? I want the Amnesty International to do her research on that.

Did Abubakar Usman, a prominent blogger, contravened the Cyber Crimes Act or not? I expected Abubakar Usman or the Amnesty International to have sued the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) but not of such as come up.

The Social Media does not give room to false accusation. That is why Accounts are blocked when you violate the Regulations of such media. So detention of Jamil Mabai, accused of posting comments on Facebook and Twitter critical of the Katsina State Government was right because what he posted can cause anarchy beyond his own control in Katsina State.

On Ahmed Salkida, a Nigerian journalist based in the United Arab Emirates, thank God he came down to Nigeria to meet the security forces that declared him wanted and he quoted to have been treated nicely by the Military. Ahmed Salkida is a freeman today as I write this.

I want Makmid Kamara and the Amnesty International to do a thorough investigation before coming to the public to issue biased reports that can incite the populace against the Government.

The Nigerian government has always been complying with its obligations under International Human Rights Law and the fundamental Rights enshrined in the 1999 Nigerian Constitution which guarantee freedom of peaceful assembly and expression.  Nigerians are of course expressing their opinions, including through peaceful protest without hindrances.

Finally, there are no journalists or bloggers in detention without trial in the country today; I stand to be corrected by the Amnesty International.


Kevin Adegbenga is a Freelance Journalist based in Port Harcourt and can be reached via kelvinadegbenga@yahoo.com; Twitter: @kelvinadegbenga

Monday 26 September 2016

Nigeria Police; Creating Tenable Environment For Change Agenda

IGP Ibrahim K. Idris

By Adewole Kehinde

“He Who Saves A Nation Breaks No Law” – Napoleon 

The Nigeria Police is the principal law enforcement agency in Nigeria with staff strength of about 371,800. There are currently plans to increase the force to 650,000, adding 280,000 new recruits to the existing 371,800. The Nigeria Police is a very large organization consisting of 36 Commands grouped into 12 Zones and 7 Administrative organs. The Nigeria Police is currently headed by IGP Ibrahim Kpotun Idris.(Wikipedia)

The vision of the Nigeria Police is to make Nigeria safer and more secured for economic development and growth; to create a safe and secured environment for everyone living in Nigeria while her mission include but not limited to partnering with other relevant Security Agencies and the public in gathering, collating and sharing of information and intelligence with the intention of ensuring the safety and security of the country;  participate in efforts to address the root causes of crime while ensuring that any criminal act is investigated so as to bring the criminals to Justice in a fair and professional manner.

The values of the Nigeria Police include: Working together with people irrespective of religious, political, social or economic affiliations to deliver quality Police service that is accessible to the generality of the people; Build a lasting trust in the Police by members of the public; Protect and uphold the rights of persons, to be impartial and respectful in the performance of Police duties; Continuously evaluate and improve Police Services; Provide equal opportunities for career developments for all members of the Force; Cooperate with all relevant government Agencies and other stakeholders and liaise with the Ministry of Police Affairs and the Police Service Commission to formulate and implement policies for the effective Policing of Nigeria.

Section 214 (1) of the 1999 Nigerian constitution provides that: There shall be a Police Force for Nigeria, which shall be known as the Nigeria Police Force, and subject to the provisions of this Section no other Police Force shall be established for the Federation or any part thereof.
(a) The Nigeria Police Force shall be organised and administered in accordance with such provisions as may be prescribed by an act of the National Assembly;
(b) The members of the Nigeria Police shall have such powers and duties as maybe conferred upon them by law;
(c) The National Assembly may make provisions for branches of the Nigeria Police Force forming part of the Armed Forces of the Federation or for the protection of harbours, waterways, railways and air fields.

The Police Act makes provision for the organisation, discipline, powers and duties of the Police, the Special Constabulary and the Traffic Wardens. According to the Police Act, the duties of the Police shall be the prevention and detection of crime, the apprehension of offenders, the preservation of law and order, the protection of life and property and the due enforcement of all laws and regulations with which they are directly charged, and shall perform such military duties within or outside Nigeria as may be required of them by, or under the authority of this or any other Act.

When it concerns public safety and public order as provided for in Section 215 of the 1999 Constitution, the President may give the Inspector General of Police such directions with respect to the maintaining and securing of public safety and public order as he may consider necessary and the Inspector General of Police shall comply with those directions or cause them to be complied with. Similarly, the Commissioner of Police in a State shall comply with the directions of the Governor of the State with respect to the maintaining and securing of public safety and public order within the State, or cause them to be complied with (Provided that before carrying out any such direction the Commissioner may request that the matter should be referred to the President for his directions. The officer’s powers and duties are conferred by statute).

What powers does a Police Officer have under the Law? A Police Officer have the power to conduct in person all prosecutions before any court, whether or not the information or complaint is laid in his name. A Police officer have the Power to arrest with or without warrant. (Section 24 of Police Act); Power to search; Power to detain and search suspected persons; Power to take fingerprints; Grant Bail of person arrested without warrant, with or without sureties, for a reasonable amount to appear before a magistrate at the day, time and place mentioned in the recognizance.

The primary responsibility of a Police Officer is to act as an official representative of government who is required and trusted to work within the law. The fundamental duties of a Police Officer include serving the community, safeguarding lives and property, protecting the innocent, keeping the peace and ensuring the rights of all to liberty, equality and justice; In performing her duties, a Police officer should perform all duties impartially, without favour of affection or ill will and without regard to status, sex, race, religion, political belief or aspiration. All citizens should be treated equally with courtesy, consideration and dignity. They should conduct themselves both in appearance and composure, in such a manner as to inspire confidence and respect for the position of public trust they hold.

A Police Officer should use responsibly, the discretion vested in his position and exercise it within the law; A Police Officer should never employ unnecessary force or violence in discharge of duty, as is reasonable in all circumstances.

Whatever a Police Officer sees, hears or learns which is of a confidential nature, should be kept secret unless the performance of duty or legal provision requires otherwise; A Police Officer should not engage in acts of corruption or bribery, nor will an Officer condone such acts by other Police Officers. The public demands that the integrity of Police Officers should be above criticism.

Police Officers should be responsible for their own Standard of Professional Performance and should take every reasonable opportunity to enhance and improve their level or knowledge and competence.

You cannot have a viable democracy without law and order. You cannot have strong institutions without law and order. And at the heart of democracy and institutions are the Police who are there to keep the peace, enforce law and order, investigate crimes and arrest criminals, enforce Judges and Attorney General’s decisions and also help keep general peace and stability.

In as much as the Nigeria Police has not lived up to this universal mantra, I vigorously submit that the fault is not the Police’s and the Police alone. The Police do not write laws; the Police do not hire and promote officers; the Police do not fire corrupt and inefficient officers; the Police are not in charge of budgetary allocations; the Police are not in charge of procuring uniforms and the tools necessary to do great jobs.  The Police, as it turned out, never really got the respect, the training and the tools it needed to function properly and achieve great things. 

To change the Police, we have to change our Orientation and National Culture. In order for the Police “to serve and protect with integrity,” we must honor them; we must provide adequate leadership, adequate compensation and proper training. We must take care of the men and women who give their lives in the service of our country. (Sabella Ogbobode Abidde)


Adewole Kehinde is a Journalist and Public Affairs Analyst based in Abuja. kennyadewole@gmail.com

Thursday 22 September 2016

Ogun Young Intellectuals Want 'Change Begins With Me' Campaign domesticated In Schools



Young intellectuals in Ogun state have urged the federal government to introduce the 'Change Begins with me' campaign in primary, secondary and tertairy schools so as to inculcate a positive attitude among young Nigerians.

This was the submission of past and present leaders of Universities, Polytechnics and Colleges of Education students associations that gathered at the Federal College of Education, Abeokuta to deliberate on the "Change Begins With Me Campaign" recently lunched by President Muhammed Buhari.

The campaign is a deliberate attempt by the President Buhari's administration to change the negative perception and mindset about Nigerians.

Participants at the event all agreed that the 'change begins with me' campaign is a well thought out campaign and should be begin with the youths who are the future of the country.

All speakers agreed that until Nigerians change themselves, the country cannot make progress.

One of the Speakers who spoke on behalf of the Muslim Students society of Nigeria, Abdulateef Ganiyu, quoting from the Quran maintained that the current situation of the country, requires deep reflection and clear understanding of the tenets of the various religion on good citizenship. 

Quoting from the holy Quran, he said, "Indeed, Allah will not change the condition ofbthe people, until they change what is in themselves"

Speaking at the event, Ogun State Chairman of the Senior Staff Union in Colleges of Education, Dr. Iyasere Emmanuel Doyin, called on all students irrespective of level or institution to embrace change of attitude in all their actions.

According to him, the older generation of Nigerians have particularly inflicted on their younger generation a negative and low moral value which has continued to result to the degrading quality of leadership in the country. 

He recalled how as a student union leader in his hey days at the University, they could force government to do the right thing, whereas students union leaders today have become stooges of political warlords and social media activists who on daily basis denigrate the image of their own country.

He said the future belongs to the youths and urged them to embrace the campaign so as to build a Nigeria of their dream.

Students union leaders present at the event pleaded with young Nigerians to embrace skills acquisitions and become self empowered, rather than waiting for government to do everything for them.

One student union leader, Ayo Samuel said, "It is high time students pick up the challenge to liberate themselves through good citizenship and dedication to nation building. The future belong to us. We must build a country that we will be proud of. And we can only do this by changing the negatives about Nigeria"

Time to End Sahara Reporter’s Diet of Lies


By Abdulkadir Inuwa Suleiman

If Sahara Reporters (SR) peddles its falsehood nine times it is necessary to reply the online rag ten times. SR, in executing its latest brief, has thrown decorum to the dogs as it scaled up its attacks on the President Muhammadu Buhari’s Chief of Staff, Mr Abba Kyari.

Fair disclosure. This response to SR’s bunkum is not at the instance of Mr Kyari. It is rather borne out of a disgust at watching the folks behind a pseudo-publication peddling falsehood to make money at the expense of the country’s wellbeing and to the detriment of reputation that people have spent years building.

The response also becomes necessary because this online rag is giving online publication bad reputation in Nigeria. In other nations, the credibility of online platforms is no different from that of their traditional counterparts. But thanks to Sahara Reporters, in Nigeria, online publications are seen as nuisance portals used by jobbers to arm-twist public office holders and businessmen to pay blackmail money.

Tragically, so long as there are gullible readers and followers of the site, its operators would remain in business. So long as hardworking ones among politically exposed persons have to safeguard their integrity SR has victims to extort. To the extent that there are willing clients to pay SR for character assassination then the online hit squad would not be out of work.

Much as one would condemn SR for its questionable reporting one must also not lose sight of those for which it executes these contracts. This is not the first time the platform is hitting out at Mr Kyari’s reputation. It did so in the past an those who placed the orders for previous jobs are well known.

There is the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Mr Ibrahim Magu. Somehow, the tools meant for fighting corruption have been deployed for carrying out vendetta. Had such payback activities been carried out with due regard to facts it would have been a welcome development since no Nigerian should be above the law. But the whole information passed on or leaked to SR, conveniently branded as ‘exclusively obtained’ are often distorted to a point where one begin to wonder if Magu is running a casino instead of an anti-corruption agency.

Not to be outdone is the National Security Adviser, NSA, Babagana Monguno, who like his co-traveller  in the EFCC abuses the information that comes to his knowledge in the course of working for Nigeria. What NSA would compromise national security with his dalliance with a rag publication just to score cheap political points? Since assuming office, it has been one potential breach or the other as Monguno has conveniently allowed his office leak information to SR like a sieve. And like a straining device, the office manipulates the information it releases to indict perceived enemies.

In the mix is Babachir David Lawal, Secretary to the Government of the Federation, SGF who has not hidden his misdirected bitterness that an effective Mr Kyari prevents him from shinning. Curiously, Lawal’s office has been another veritable source of sensitive documents and information leaking to SR. Actually, the scale on which the SGF’s office ferret documents to SR can be likened more to an outpouring than a leak. This is a development that has killed confidence in doing government business to the extent that other members of the cabinet are now sceptical of passing communication through him.

Much as these SR clients appear motely, a common tread that runs through them is the Bourdillon connection. Someone is still bitter that the country wasn’t handed over to him to run as an extensions of his fiefdom. The heat emanating from the anger in this is meant to sear more than Mr Kyari. Other persons that are seen as incorruptible President Buhari loyalists are similarly set up for roasting. The directive from Bourdillon is straightforward – malign Mr President’s trusted appointees to the point where he sacks them. The next phase would be to replace the sacked appointees with Bourdillon lackeys.

Anyone that has paid close attention to SR’s content would see the puny efforts made at running stories that suggest these connections were also to be on the receiving end of its venom. The reality however is that it is a guise to mask the identity of those hounding Mr Kyari by themselves appearing as the platform’s victims.

Since neither SR nor its clients are ready to desist from these acts that threaten the integrity of Nigeria, the responsibility falls on citizens to call them to order.  This is something that must be done as a matter of urgency as we all stand the risk of losing the ability to distinguish lies from truth if we continue to consume this diet of falsehood.


Inuwa Suleiman contributed the piece from Katsina, Katsina State.

How Amnesty International Research Indicted Jonathan Administration




By Kelvin Adegbenga
  
I was surprised to read the Amnesty International Report via https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/09/nigeria-special-police-squad-get-rich-torturing-detainees/ dated 21 September, 2016.

The report carried out by one, Damian Ugwu, Amnesty International's Nigeria Researcher said that “A Nigerian police unit set up to combat violent crime has instead been systematically torturing detainees in its custody as a means of extracting confessions and lucrative bribes”.

It is on record that the revised version of a bill to criminalize torture which was returned unsigned by the former President Goodluck Jonathan in 2012 has been passed by the House of Representatives in June 2016 and has been resubmitted to the Senate for further debates by the Buhari administration.

The research by Amnesty International that the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) uses hanging, starvation, beatings, shootings and mock executions as a means of “extracting confessions and lucrative bribes", is baseless.

The Inspector General of Police, IGP Ibrahim Idris has strengthen the Police X-Squad Units in all Police Commands with the deployment of thoroughly vetted, selfless and patriotic officers to tackle corruption and abuse of office within the Nigeria Police and at the Federal, States and Local Government levels. The personnel deployed to the Anti-Corruption Unit are supported with incentives to make them more effective in the discharge of their duties.

So I wonder where Amnesty International came about SARS officers who “regularly demand bribes, steal and extort money from criminal suspects and their families”. I challenge the Amnesty International to publish evidence(s) of such corrupt activities of the SARS officers under this administration.

I am aware every detainee at the SARS have access to Lawyers and Human Rights Defenders, so I doubt the so called “ruthless human rights violations of victims”. If victims are arrested and tortured until they either make a ‘confession’ or pay officers a bribe to be released, then such victims must be guilty of the offence they are arrested for.

I want to remind the Amnesty International that the Nigeria Police has set up a Complaint Response Unit – (CRU), under the able leadership of Assistant Commissioner of Police, Abayomi Shogunle where citizens make report of any violation of their Rights by the Police in the country. As a follower of the twitter handle and the Facebook page of the Complaint Response Unit, I can testify to the fact that every report received is treated to logical conclusion.

I know Amnesty International may claim that the Police did not give them access to information but like I said earlier, the new Inspector General of Police, IGP Ibrahim Idris has strengthening the Public Relations Department as well as the Complaint Response Unit of the Force, no matter the enormity of complaint you tabled before the FPRO and CRU, you must get a reasonable response.

The fact that the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) gave the Amnesty International access to the detention centre in Abuja where they found 130 detainees is enough evidence that the Nigeria Police has nothing to hide from the General public including the Amnesty International.  

On the issue that SARS investigating civil matters and in some cases tortures detainees involved in contractual, business and even non-criminal disputes, I am challenging the Amnesty International to show the World evidences because we all know that civil matters are settled in the Law Court as the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) has no business with “contractual, business and even non-criminal disputes”.

If Amnesty International claimed that detainees are not allowed access to a lawyer, a doctor or their family during detention, how come they had access to the detainees in Abuja and even know the numbers in the cell? I know the Nigeria Police have well trained medical personal and clinics across the country and in some cases collaborate with Medical centers to treat Police officers and those under their custodians.  

To show how biased the Amnesty International is; the researcher claimed that “when asked to explain why no Police officers had been suspended or prosecuted for torture, the police simply DENIED that any torture had taken place”. I am sure the Police officer said nothing but the truth, so the issue of denial does not arise here.

If erring officers are not investigated, they can’t be transferred to other Stations, the Amnesty International should know better on this rather than saying the Police officer interviewed “did not say whether the claims against them were being investigated”.

I am also challenging the Amnesty International to come out with evidences that “many of these officers have bribed their way to SARS in the first place. The police chiefs in charge are themselves entwined in the corruption.” This is a grave indictment and the Amnesty International must substantiate these allegations with concrete evidence.

The Amnesty International also claimed that SARS officers are found “stealing or confiscating property from relatives of detained suspects”. My question is, “where do the SARS officers get the original documents of the so called properties they steal or confiscate?

The Amnesty International is just out to tarnish the good image of the Police that has been going through positive reform under the new Inspector General of Police.

From the report of occurrences the Amnesty International gathered for her research, I am surprised that they never bothered to ask the victims what was their own offences; did the victims make any report to the Complaint Response Unit of the Nigeria Police; the National Human Right Commission or the Human Rights Defenders?

For the record, the Amnesty International should know that the Nigeria Police in December 2014 launched a Human Rights Manual which proscribes torture and other ill-treatment of detainees, the new Inspector General of Police, Ibrahim Idris is already reforming and reorganizing all the Units in the Force including the SARS. This was part of the Inspector General of Police meeting held on Wednesday, 21 September, 2016 with the leadership of the 60 PMF Squadrons, 21 CTU Commanders and 12 SPU Commanders in the country.

As far I am concerned, the latest report by Amnesty International indicted the past administration of Goodluck Jonathan and not the Buhari administration. Since the previous government attempts at wiping out torture proved unsuccessful, the new Inspector General of Police, IGP Ibrahim Idris will surely ensure that officers responsible for any Human Rights violations will be held responsible.

Inspector General of Police, Ibrahim Idris as a refined officer will never allow Police officer to inflict torture or other ill-treatment on detainees under any circumstances.

To set the record straight, I want the Amnesty International to know that the UN Secretary General appointed IGP Ibrahim Idris as a Police Commissioner in UNAMID, in Darfur. That was the 1st time a Nigerian Police officer was clinching a B2 position for any UN mission in the world.

However, the offer was declined by IGP Ibrahim Idris to enable him contribute his quarter in ensuring Peace and Stability during and after the 2015 General Elections.

Under the United Nations, IGP Ibrahim Idris attended a seminar on re-organization and reforms of Formed Police Units (FPU), at the Centre for excellence for Stability Police Forces (COESPU) in Vicenza, Italy in 2004. He also attended the UN Senior Leadership Induction Course and UN Leadership Course at the UN Headquarters in New York in February and September 2009 respectively. He further attended Civil-Military Coordination in Disaster Management Course organized by the United States Military Pacific Command and United Nations in Jakarta, Indonesia in 2010.  

He has severally served as visiting lecturer on “Roles of Police on United Nations Peace Keeping Operations” in Nigerian Defense College in 2011, 2012 and 2013. He was a Mentor to African Union/United Nations Senior Leadership Seminar in Douala, Cameroun 2010 and African Union/ECOWAS Senior Leadership Course held in Nigerian Defense College Abuja in 2012.

IGP Ibrahim Idris has received many Commendations and Awards in the course of his career, including the Nigerian Inspector General of Police Commendation Award for his performance as Commandant PMF Training College, Gwoza in 2004, the Special Representative of the Secretary General Commendation Award for Planning, Execution and Coordination of Security for the Liberian National Elections in 2005, and the Special Representative of the Secretary General’s Award for coordinating major operations in Timor Leste in 2011.

He also bagged two Outstanding Leadership Awards by two United Nations Missions, namely United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) and United Nations Integrated Mission in Timor Leste (UNMIT) in 2006 and 2009 respectively for his outstanding performance as Operations Coordinator in UNMIL and Deputy Police Commissioner in charge of Operations in UNMIT respectively.

In March 2011, the President of Democratic Republic of Timor Leste, Dr Jose Ramos Horta (Nobel Lauret) awarded Ibrahim the Country’s highest National Medal, the “Medal of Merit”, for his contribution to the security and stability of Timor Leste. He served for over seven years in the United Nations.

With the above past achievements of the IGP Ibrahim Idris, I can assure the Amnesty International that their next research will be a commendation to the men of the Nigeria Police especially the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS).

Kelvin Adegbenga is a Freelance Journalist based in Port Harcourt. kelvinadegbenga@yahoo.com Twitter: @kelvinadegbenga


Tuesday 20 September 2016

Towards A Corrupt Free Nigeria Police In The 21st Century



By Adewole Kehinde

“We have a zero tolerance for payment of money to free suspect. I am appealing to members of the public, not to corrupt my men; it takes two to tango. If they ask you for bribe and you refuse to give, and you have avenues where your grievances can be ventilated, I do not see any reason why you should give them bribe. The Commissioner of Police is there; the Area Commander is there; the DPO is there; and the technical platform (to report corrupt policemen) is there. We have opened ourselves to public accountability. So, you cannot now say the whole problem should be blamed on the police force’’, those were the words of the former Inspector-General of Police, Solomon Arase.

There are many issues which have made the Nigerian Police to engross in corrupt practices. These issues are the root causes behind every corrupt practice we see in the Nigerian Police.

What makes a Police Officer to collect bribe? Why do people bribe Police Officers easily? Why is the public image’ about Nigerian Police not pleasant? What could be responsible for this terrible image of the Nigerian Police in the public? These are many questions the Inspector General of Police should be asking and finding solutions to, if the problem of corruption in the Nigerian Police is to be minimized.

Corruption has eaten deep into the fabric of Nigerian society and seems intractable, but the situation can be remedied given disciplined and forthright leadership and a citizenry that is united in its resentment to corruption. By March 1987, corruption and indiscipline had been identified as the two most serious problems confronting Nigeria since independence.

It is germane to note that corruption had always being the excuse given by the military to take over of political power, yet it continued however.

The Nigeria Police is perhaps the most visible agent of government. This is because the Police are the caretakers of the society. To a large extent, the growth, actions and behaviours of the Police as an institution, not only reflect the political and economic character of society, but also mirror what those in power are willing or able to endure or perhaps even demand of the Police. It is rather mentioned merely to remind my reader that corruption within the ranks of the Police owes its origins in part to the wishes, desires and goals of its colonial creators.

Corruption exists in the Nigeria Police much the same as it does in any other Police organisation the World over, except perhaps, in terms of its extent and the organisation’s reaction to it. Nonetheless, the issue of corruption in the Nigeria Police as noted above cannot be treated in isolation of the larger society.

On a weekly if not daily basis, the media in Nigeria reports on one act of corruption or other illegality perpetrated by the Police somewhere in the country. Transparency International not only listed Nigeria as one of the foremost nations afflicted by corruption, but also ascribed to the Nigerian law enforcement a contributory percentage of the activity that caused the rating.

The paraphernalia of corruption are social and economic. Governments and communities suffer from the malady as it makes them uneconomic in that less revenue is collected, with a loss to government much greater than the individual gains; More money is paid for the goods and services procured; Policies are misleading to maximize corrupt gains, usually in favour of capital intensive spending; Resources are diverted away from social and developmental priorities; Investment is discouraged; Society becomes unstable, because people become angry, particularly the poor who cannot afford to pay bribes and who get hurt the most, and others whose human rights are violated; The rich bait antipathy, through wanting more riches and modest their corrupt gains they make corruption a political issue; Society becomes unsafe because bribes protect criminals and facilitate drug-smuggling, gun-running, terrorism and other crimes; Bribes make the protection of society nose-dive, because people pay bribes to avoid compliance with the requirements for health, safety and the environment.

Corruption in the Police is both internal and external which for apparent reasons draws greater attention. By way of definition, corruption in Policing is the misuse of authority by a Police officer acting officially to fulfill or achieve his personal needs or wants.

It involves the simultaneous presence of three distinct elements namely misuse of Authority; misuse of official capacity and misuse of personal attainment. There is no reason to believe that Police officers as individuals are necessarily of a stronger moral fibre by upbringing or training than any other member of society. However, when a Police officer is found wanting or violates the law, the disgrace expressed by society is at its highest. This is simply because the nonconformity of a Police officer let down the confidence and trust of society and worst still, blots the entire organisation. The impact of this realisation may further be compounded by the knowledge that corruption in the Police can invert the goals of the organisation to the extent that Police powers encourage and create crime, rather than deter it.

Corrupt behaviour as understood by the ordinary Nigerian probably consists of: pay-offs to the Police by essentially law abiding citizens for infringement of statutes such as traffic laws; pay-offs to the police by organised crime or individuals who habitually break the law to make money such as drug dealers or prostitutes;  the receipt of money, favours or discounts for services rendered; pocketing recovered money from the proceeds of crime; giving false testimony to ensure dismissal of cases in court and the actual perpetration of criminal acts to mention a few. The danger apparent is that in extreme cases, Police are not just protecting criminals, but have become a complicit part in the planning and execution of crimes.

How best do we fight corruption in the Nigeria Police? In my own opinion, the Police force must take ownership of the fight against corruption within its organisation and master the in-house battles against graft. It is not so much the fact that officers are tempted by money that is important, but whether an institutional culture exists to discourage it. The fight to be effective must be taken on an operational and policy level.

The ‘X’ Squad exists to combat corruption in the Nigeria Police. It has to rely on information mainly within the Force to achieve any significant impact. Over the years, there have been few instances recorded as successes but, by and large it has been a failure for two principal reasons.

First, Police officers are extremely reluctant to inform on one another as this in itself is seen as a form of disloyalty and secondly, the ‘X’ Squad Officers who themselves are somewhat scorned, are reluctant to make sensitivities among their colleagues worst. Besides which they are not immune from suspicion themselves. The lack of success of this section though lends itself to an interpretation which unavoidably cast slanders on the leadership of the force. The section needs strengthening, capacity building and the full backing of the organisation in order to come out of hiding and meet the expectations of its existence.

On a policy level the Police must in principle have an organization committed fully to Openness, Transparency and Impartiality in the conduct of its activities. To enhance transparency and ensure consistency in policy guidelines on staff, administrative and operational matters, a guideline must be created, updated and brought to the attention of all Police officers. The guidelines should cover amongst others: Staff recruitment, promotion and posting procedures; Job description/schedule of each post; Keeping and checking attendance registers; Performance appraisals; Staff complaints; Investigations; Operational procedures, and Disciplinary procedures to mention a few.

Similarly, a Code of Conduct for Police officers needs to be developed for the consumption of all ranks to ensure that officers are committed to ethical practices in the discharge of their duties. A breach of the code should attract stringent disciplinary action. The code should cover these key elements: Corporate governance and the mission statement; Rules on the acceptance of advantages; Guidelines on conflict of interest and, procedures to declare conflicts; and to handle such declarations; Rules on the acceptance of entertainment; Handling of proprietary information; Use of organisational resources.

Corruption within the Police like crime within society is unlikely to be eradicated. It can however be controlled by the Police but with the assistance and support of society. At the organisational level controlling corruption requires strong and determined leadership, because corruption occurs at the very top as well as the bottom and all points in between in the hierarchy. The top Police brass must make it clear that corruption in all its forms will not be tolerated and furthermore will be severely punished. If concerted and stringent action is not taken against corrupt activity, the message down the ranks will be that of tolerance which will only serve to increase corruption within the organisation.

Moreover, in training institutions ethical behaviour and decision should be rewarded, promoted and applauded because failing to make officers aware of the consequences of corruption only serves to encourage it. Irrespective of the present effectiveness of sections such as the ‘X’ Squad, it should be strengthened and encouraged as its existence serves as a deterrent. The Public Relations Department of the Nigeria Police should highlight educational programmes within communities that touch on the negative effects of Police corruption. Communities must realise that even the most basic form of corruption, gratification only acts as a catalyst to more sinister forms of misdeeds. One further point, perhaps it is time that Police Officers who have been proven to have known of corruption among their colleagues but remain silent should be sanctioned by the Nigeria Police or the law.

Police management needs to encourage regular anti-graft educational talks and seminars in which its officers participate. These talks should be integrated in training programmes for all cadres from the Training Schools to the Academy through to the Staff College. The training session would cover anti-graft legislation, the effects of corruption, and the problems caused by conflict of interest and indebtedness as a beginning.

Case studies of different scenarios involving Police work would be used to stimulate discussion among officers on the ethical dilemmas the may face. Ultimately through these sessions police officers will acquire the basic knowledge and skills to guard against the temptations of corruption, while senior officers gain knowledge in managing staff integrity.

Every Nigerian Police Officer should be provided with two sets of complete uniforms and kits in a year; adequate provision of working tools/logistics and operational costs that will make the average Police officer be independent of complainants support in the investigation of reported cases for instance; The outlook of most Police Stations are not encouraging, it must be given the needed attention. With no decent chairs and tables, electronic appliances and communication gadgets, it becomes difficult and uncomfortable for the average Police officer to find the job interesting. Police Barracks should be well-furnished for Police officers to occupy.

Police Stations should be encouraged to have dedicated petrol stations to constantly fuel their patrol vehicles. They should also have their own mechanic workshops and stores with all the relevant car spare parts to regularly maintain their vehicles, both heavy duty and smaller vehicles.

Police officers transferred from their duty post should be given enough funds to accommodate themselves, immediately they get to their new stations. The Nigeria Police should have Guest Houses well equipped, in each State of the federation to address accommodation problem.

The Nigerian Police should have their own separate yearly budgets that would address all their operational needs and logistics that are not controlled or dictated by government Executives.

You will agree with the fact that it is practically impossible to have personnel of the Nigeria Police to stay committed at their jobs and give her best and all the skills they can muster, if their basic welfare and well-being in relation to the jobs are not adequately taken care of or given the required attention.

I am however glad that the new Inspector General of Police, Ibahim Idris is on the same page with me and has ready set the motion to address most of these issues I have raised here.

Additional information was sourced from Independent Corrupt Practices & Other Related Offences Commission

Adewole Kehinde is a Journalist and Public Affairs Analyst based in Abuja and can be reached via kennyadewole@gmail.com