Youth Alliance Educates One-Man, Onwubiko’s HURIWA, On IGP’s Tenure

The Integrity Youth Alliance, an organisation that has been monitoring development trends in the Nigerian Police Force for over 15 years, schooled the one-man NGO Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) on the tenure of the Inspector General of Police.

Reacting to a publication titled “NIS: Tenure extensions on Tinubu’s watch favour only Yoruba; HURIWA alleges,” the publicity director of the Alliance, Danjuma Lamido, said it is unfortunate that ignorants like Emmanuel Onwubiko could refer to the tenured office of the Inspector General of Police as an extension.

“Despite his ignorance, he still says, “President Bola Tinubu pushed the Police Act (Amendment) Bill 2024 to the NASS to amend the Police Act of 2020. This was to enable Egbetokun to complete a full term of four years.”

“The same HURIWA said that the Public Service Rule 020810 declares a compulsory retirement age for all grades in the service to be 60 years or 35 years of pensionable service, whichever is earlier, but forgot that the position of the Inspector General of Police is an appointment as stipulated in the 1999 Constitution (as amended): “There shall be— (a) an Inspector-General of Police who the President shall appoint subject to section 216(2) of this Constitution”.

“We wish to state that Egbetokun’s constitutional tenure did not create any internal schism. Also, there was nothing like a massive purge of many “so-called ambitious and activist senior police officers” by the hierarchy of the Nigeria police favoured by President Tinubu, as made believe by the one-man NGO, HURIWA.

“We recall that the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), has declared that the amendment of the Police Act by the National Assembly in 2024 was in order and no individual or organisation has gone to court to challenge that to date; not even the one-man NGO, HURIWA.

“On a final note, we wish to say that IGP Kayode Egbetokun got his appointment on merits, competences and patriotism against the malicious statement by one man NGO, HURIWA, that his tenured office was based on friendship and ethnic affiliation, the statement concluded.

SWYA Carpets Sahara Reporters Story As An Example Of Irresponsible Journalism

The South West Youth Alliance has lambasted the publisher of the serial blackmail, Sahara Reporters, and failed former presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore over his reckless and dubious statement on the person of IGP Kayode Egbetokun.

Responding to a publication by Sahara Reporters titled “Sowore Lambasts Tinubu For Extending Kemi Nandap’s Tenure As Nigerian Immigration Boss, Says It’s Reward For Incompetence Just Like IGP Egbetokun,” the coordinator of the alliance, Taiwo Adegbenga, said that Sowore is out to tarnish the reputation of IGP Egbetokun by saying that “Kayode Egbetokun, as IGP of Nigeria Police Force, was murdering protesters and charging minors for treason.”

“We challenge the failed former presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore, to show Nigerians the protesters “murdered by Kayode Egbetokun as IGP” or face legal action for this reckless and mischievous statement.

“Ensuring accurate and factual reporting is part of the code of ethics guiding the journalism profession anywhere in the world. But it’s quite unfortunate that Sahara Reporters do not regard this ethical standard, and this explains why the medium is filled with a myriad of unverified and baseless reports and fabrications.

“Laziness and irresponsibility of media organisations like Sahara Reporters will continue to murder the journalism profession in Nigeria. It is pathetic that a media outfit like Sahara Reporters could publish this kind of unverified” story—“Kayode Egbetokun, as IGP of the Nigeria Police Force, was murdering protesters and charging minors for treason.” This is irresponsible journalism at its peak.

“We therefore call on Omoyele Sowore and Sahara Reporters to desist from dishing out baseless, unverified reports as well as stop misinforming and misleading the public, which are fast becoming their trademark.

Youth Alliance Criticises Sahara Reporters; Claims IGP Kayode Egbetokun Is Not Panicking

....Says there is no growing dissatisfaction among police personnel over Egbetokun's Leadership 

The Integrity Youth Alliance has blasted Sahara Reporters, an online medium known for mischievous publications, for saying that "pressure is mounting on President Bola Tinubu to remove the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Kayode Egbetokun, following growing dissatisfaction among police personnel over his leadership."

In a press release on Thursday, March 13th, 2025, in Kano, the Alliance's Director of Publicity, Danjuma Lamido, said police personnel do not grow dissatisfied with Egbetokun's leadership, as Sahara Reporters maliciously reported.

"We want to state without mincing words that IGP Egbetokun is not anxious about any situation. Sahara Reporters, known for his spiteful publication, is out again to cause disunity between IGP Egbetokun and DIG Idegwu Basil Okuoma.

"It is untrue that IGP Egbetokun has recently been experiencing health issues due to stress. The IGP is fit to face his duty as the Inspector General of Police.

"It is so unfortunate that Sahara Reporters could stoop so low to say "...he lives with only one kidney after facing a kidney-related problem years ago when he was a Chief Superintendent of Police."

"Since Sahara Reporters and its dubious owner, Omoyele Sowore, failed to defame IGP Egbetokun, another tactic is to say that "Tinubu is under immense pressure to replace Egbetokun, and this has left him panicking because his position as IGP is uncertain."

"IGP Egbetokun is fit and sound and attends several meetings, files, and courtesy visits daily. He is not having any challenges affecting his work schedule as mischievously reported by Sahara Reporters.

"We can state categorically that senior officers in the Nigeria Police Force have a very strong confidence in IGP Egbetokun's leadership. He has never disregarded any court orders concerning the retirement process as made believe by Sahara Reporters.

"It is not true that IGP Egbetokun intentionally delayed the probe of the retirement of senior officers in the Nigeria Police Force. Our organisation, Integrity Youth Alliance, wrote to the Police Service Commission in December 2024, as the PSC is saddled with the responsibilities of retiring senior officers of the force.

"On a final note, we wish to reiterate that IGP Kayode Egbetokun is not an "illegal" IGP as maliciously published by Sahara Reporters, and there is no growing lack of confidence in IGP Egbetokun's leadership among members of the Force. The entire Force is happy with the giant stride development and professionalism the IGP has brought about in the Force, the statement concluded.

Security Agencies, Shine Your Eyes On, Take It Back Movement

By Chukwudi Amaefule

 

I laughed after reading a letter from the Take It Back Movement telling the FCT Minister Wike to release Eagle Square for the planned demonstration.

 

In a letter signed by Damilare Adenola, Director of Mobilization for the Take It Back Movement (TIB) in Abuja, the protesters demanded unrestricted access to the venue 24/7 throughout the protest and possibly even after it concludes.

 

The letter read, “I write you as the Director of Mobilization, Take It Back Movement (TIB) to your office to grant us access to the Eagles Square between August 1st and 10th, 2024, for our #DaysOfRage, #EndBadGovernance protest.

 

“This request entails using this national asset day and night for the duration of the historic protest.

 

“Also, note that the protest may be prolonged beyond ten days as we embark on the protracted crisis occasioned by the ruling party.

 

“Further, your office must also ensure the provision of a 24-hour power supply, toilet facilities, water, and security for the convenience of Nigerian citizens who will be camped out at Eagle Square.

 

“In short, we ask that the protesters are accorded the courtesy accorded to foreign and local official dignitaries who have frequently used the space.

 

“In addition, we request that the outer wire mesh barrier facing the Aso Rock Villa be removed in the meantime, as protesters may decide to visit the Presidential Villa during the protest.

 

“It is our sincere hope that this request will be granted expeditiously.”

 

My biggest shock came when I also read the letter from a human rights activist, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa (SAN), notifying security agencies, requesting protection over planned public meetings, rallies, and processions by a non-governmental body, the Take It Back Movement, its members, some patriotic Nigerians, and groups.

 

In the letter dated Friday, July 26, 2024, the senior advocate writing as solicitor to the Take It Back Movement notified the Inspector General of Police (IGP) and the Director of the Department of State Services (DSS) that the planned rallies would commence from August 1 to 10, 2024, or any time thereafter.

 

He said the rallies would be held at the Eagle Square in Abuja and other public spaces in the capital cities of the 36 states and the headquarters of the 774 local government councils.

 

Adegboruwa, while reiterating the role of the security agencies during such rallies and protests, urged the leadership of the security agencies to make available the details of any of their officers or teams that will be assigned to cover the said meetings, rallies, or processes to harmonise plans and strategies for the same.

 

My thinking after reading from the Movement and its sponsor about the planned protest was that the security agencies, especially the DSS and the Nigeria Police, would investigate those behind the Take It Back Movement, especially after Bayo Onanuga, special adviser on information and strategy to President Bola Tinubu, has alleged that supporters of Peter Obi are behind the proposed nationwide protest.

 

On 17th September 2022, the Take-It-Back Movement knocked the Nigeria Police Force over the shameful invasion of the supporters of the Labour Party who had gathered in Abakaliki, the Ebonyi State capital, to rally in support of their presidential candidate, Peter Obi.

 

The Take-It-Back Movement, in a release on Saturday by its Director of Media and Communications, Dr Chidi Nwanyanwu, described the action of the police as “criminal, lawless, and a flagrant disregard for rights to peaceful assembly.”

 

The statement reads, “The Take It Back Movement strongly condemns the violent repression of supporters of the Labour Party who had gathered in Abakaliki to rally in support of their candidate." We describe the action of the police as criminal, lawless, and a flagrant disregard for the right to peaceful assembly.

 

“We worry that while insurgents and all sorts of armed criminals have made the entire country unsafe, especially with the recent deadly attack on Ifeanyi Ubah's convoy, the police has chosen unsurprisingly to concern itself with indulging in criminal repression of peaceful gatherings and offering itself to be used by the ruling party, APC, to repress oppositions.

 

“We wish to remind the police that as an institution funded by the Nigerian people, it is duty bound to protect our rights to peaceful assembly and ensure the maximum protection of Nigerians whether they are in political rallies, protests, meetings, and all other activities within the confines of their constitutional rights.

 

“While we call on well-meaning Nigerians to rise against the fascism of the APC and its attempt to make the electoral processes violent and non-credible, we also call for the immediate arrest and prosecution of all officers involved in the lawlessness that happened today in Abakaliki.

 

“Meanwhile we call on all Nigerians to understand that ā real political change can only come through a revolutionary alternative like Omoyele Sowore and the African Action Congress (AAC). Instead of negotiating with fascist rulers like David Umahi, like Peter Obi is doing, what is needed is to call the bluff of these rogue elements once and for all.

 

“This takes real and tested courage, and we urge all Nigerians who want to build another country away from want and war to ignore all sentiments and join the revolutionary train. For it is such a principled and ever-ready train that can defend the votes of Nigerians come the 2023 elections.”

 

(https://saharareporters.com/2022/09/17/take-it-back-movement-condemns-police-assault-disruption-labour-partys-peter-obi-rally)

 

Also, on 14th March 2023, the headline "This Nigerian Voter Created A National Movement for Peter Obi" was the major news online via (https://www.zikoko.com/citizen/this-nigerian-voter-created-a-national-movement-for-peter-obi/)

 

The news reads, "Today’s Nigerian voter focuses on @Jack_ng01, the founder of the Take Back Naija movement, a political movement that was campaigning for Peter Obi. He tells us his motivations for the movements, their achievements, and his reaction when Obi lost the 2023 presidential elections.

 

“The Nigerian Voter” is Blessing, an IT professional in his early thirties. He also convenes the Take Back Naija movement, mobilising youths nationwide towards garnering support for Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi. Citizen spoke with him about his political journey and inspiration for birthing the group. He also shared how he felt about Obi not being declared the winner for the 2023 elections and his future goals with the movement towards the gubernatorial elections.

 

What made you interested in politics?

 

My interest in politics started in 2006 when I lived with my uncle. Then he was a councillor in his local government, and I often listened to him having political conversations about the Anambra and Enugu state governments in the parlour. We also listened to news stations on the radio and television frequently, as well as in newspapers. I also noticed that my uncle was calm, quiet, and a good person all around, yet he was in politics. This gave me the mindset that not all politicians were bad people. You could also find good ones too.

 

However, I started to get involved in politics in 2010 in the Anambra State elections. I was the deputy ward secretary of Nanka Ward 1, and my mum was the woman leader at the time. Since then, I either voted (from the 2011-2023 election cycles) or made sure I could sensitise people towards political awareness. I didn’t do all of this on a grand scale until 2021.

 

From 2011-2023, who did you vote for, and why did you vote for them?

 

I voted for Goodluck Jonathan in 2011. I can’t exactly say that it was a conscious decision. He was the preferred choice for most people in the South. This was despite the fact that I wasn’t a People’s Democratic Party (PDP) member then but a card-carrying member of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN). The ACN candidate then was Nuhu Ribadu, but most didn’t think he stood a chance.

 

In 2015, I displayed my interest in Goodluck Jonathan again in the elections via social media. However, I couldn’t vote because I had just relocated from Anambra to Abuja, and I didn’t have the chance to transfer my Permanent Voter’s Card (PVC).

 

In 2019, I travelled to Anambra to vote for Atiku Abubakar of the PDP, and of course, I voted for Peter Obi of the Labour Party (LP) in 2023.

 

Which election year would you say you had your craziest election experience?

 

The 2023 election was my craziest because I played a major role in the elections.

 

What was this major role?

 

I was a convener for the Take Back Naija political movement in 2022. It was basically youths coming together to influence a change for good governance from federal to local government. The politics we played in Nigeria over the years had not really worked for Nigeria. Thus, we must shift from what we are used to doing something different.

 

How did your movement influence this change?

 

We did this by making sure we scrutinised each potential presidential candidate and their antecedents. It was then decided that whoever we saw as our preferred candidate would be given enormous support. We would mobilise for his campaign, raise funds, advertise, arrange conferences, etc. It then became our duty or mandate to help these candidates with their campaigns when they align with the people’s values.

 

After much deliberation, we concluded that Obi’s antecedents and his plans for Nigeria aligned with our values and represented the future kind of politics we wanted. Even the name for the movement came from one of his speeches where he said, “Take back your country; it is your future they are toying with.” The campaign for Obi officially started in January 2022.

 

What did Take Back Naija do for Peter Obi?

 

As of January 2022, Peter Obi was still a member of the PDP with presidential ambitions. We then met with PDP delegates in Abuja in the form of a peaceful protest to convince them to elect Peter Obi for president. This was coupled with a social hashtag, #GiveUsPeterObi. We also organised the first nationwide one million man march for Peter Obi in May 2022 and erected billboards in major cities in Nigeria such as Port Harcourt, Lagos, Abuja, and even some Northern cities such as Kaduna and Sokoto. We had radio jingles for him at the early stage of the campaign and many more.

 

Shortly after, Obi and his team resigned from the PDP to the Labour Party before the PDP primaries. We examined his previous speeches and broadcast critical soundbites on his plans for Nigerian citizens. There was also created a website for Obi and a Telegram community for Obi supporters in various locations across Nigeria. A press release was distributed while Obi was still a member of the PDP. In the press release, we told PDP delegates that we’d give at least ten million votes if they gave us Peter Obi (if he won at the PDP primaries).

 

Getting people to support the movement even after he left was easy because the man had a way of inspiring voters.

 

Is it your team that inspired the Obidient movement?

 

No one can fully lay claim to the “Obidient” movement, as it just happened organically. However, if there is anyone to be responsible for it, it should be Obi. Without him, the movement would not exist.

 

What was your reaction when Obi wasn’t declared winner of the 2023 presidential elections?

 

Personally, I didn’t feel bad because I knew that Obi was the true winner of the election. I also didn’t feel bad because I believed that we did all the things that we should do as young people towards the elections. We only overtrusted INEC in believing that they were going to do the right thing by not rigging.

 

How hopeful are you about Obi’s victory in court?

 

I don’t trust the court system, to be honest. Even if a ruling is given, executives don’t even obey. I don’t have faith in the judicial system, but somehow I believe that we can reclaim our mandate. This is because I know Obi to be a fighter and that God has ordained his path. Let the will of God be done. However, whatever happens outside now, I am at peace that we wrote our names on the right side of history.

 

Amazing. Are you voting for anyone in the gubernatorial elections on March 18?

 

Sadly, I won’t be voting on March 18 because Abuja doesn’t hold governorship elections. The president can only appoint a Federal Capital Territory (FCT) minister. However, this doesn’t mean the Take Back Naija team rests on our oars. We’d be campaigning for Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour of the Labour Party because he is smart, honest, and transparent. I like certain things he discusses in his manifesto, such as transparency in Lagos and free medical insurance. For me, this serves as a breath of fresh air.

 

From the above information, it will be disastrous for the Federal Government to grant the group any right to carry out its planned protest as it will amount to a complete coup d'état.

 

A stitch in time saves nine.

 

Chukwudi Amaefule writes from Anambra State and can be reached via https://web.facebook.com/chukwudi.amaefule.52

 

Obidient Is An Igbo Political Organisation

 By Olutayo Ayodele

 

Today's Punch publication unarguably reveals the fundamental flaw in the superstructure of the Obidient Movement. All the 53 amorphous subgroups which make up the spatial structure of the movement are headed by persons who are Igbos.          

 

It becomes crystal clear that Peter Obi heads a political movement whose sole purpose is to force an Igbo ethnic agenda on Nigeria under the presence of establishing a new political order.

 

I recalled that the Chairman, of the 9th Senate Committee on Cooperation and Integration in Africa/NEPAD, Senator Chimaroke Nnamani, Enugu East, once took a swipe at the presidential candidate of the Labour Party, Peter Obi, alleging that he introduced religious and ethnic politics in Nigeria.

 

The former Enugu State Governor said that reviewing the activities of last year's elections, he concluded that “Peter Obi deflowered the virgin innocence of political patriotism and nationalism in Nigeria.

 

“For his ethnic war, he spread across Igbo-domiciled areas across Nigeria, specifically markets and shopping malls. He picked out Christian minority areas for his campaigns in Northern and Central Nigeria. His dual opium of tribalism and religious bigotry has made National Landing depart no more.”

 

The Labour Party, with the support of the Obidient, won and has a subnational government in place in Abia State. What is new in Abia today?

 

During the campaign, the DG, Akin Osuntokun who happened to be from the South West, was just like a figurehead as Obi's SSG, who is from the East, for 8 years, was technically in charge of the campaign committee from day one to the dissolution of the campaign committee.

 

After the elections, I had anticipated that the Obidient movement would give up on its punishing mission and transform into an ideological pressure group—a respectable opposition. However, the movement remains far from being civil and ideological. It has grown more feral, nastier, desperate, and brutal. The Obidient movement is beginning to resemble a gang of rebels.

 

The Obidient movement comprised mainly of political neophytes and tribal bigots is characteristically misguided, and uncultured holding on fanatically to an erroneous belief that Obi won the 2023 Presidential elections despite his obvious lack of support from the North West and South West. These two zones make up about 50% of total votes at every national election since the 1st Republic.

All Nigerians' security is at risk from any movement that is not motivated by the country's interests. The Obidient movement doesn't seem to care that its tactics harm both national security and the collective consciousness. I worry that a few individuals from the banned organisation, IPOB, might be in positions of authority inside the movement.

 

The use of violent threats, lies, and acts against people who disagree portends a more dire future. Individuals fighting Nigeria through other channels may be using the Obidient movement as a political forum.

 

The already deteriorated relations between Nigerians from different ethnic backgrounds are being made worse by the movement's tactics. This is the origin of interethnic conflict. Contrary to popular belief, it is not the case that the Yoruba and Igbo are at odds with one another. The remainder of Nigeria is up against the "Obidients."

 

I see Nigeria as a symbol of hope and promise for a better present and future, of fortitude and bravery to rise from nothing and dust, of purpose amid chaos, of brotherhood amid differences, and of love even in perilous circumstances.

 

Olutayo Ayodele is a freelance writer based in Lagos State. 

A Call For Action From All Concerned Authorities Regarding The Endless Shenanigans In RMRDC

It seems from all indications that the activities of the Director-General of the Raw Materials Research Development Council (RMRDC) a foremost institution whose activities should have supported the acceleration and actualization of the President Bola Tinubu Renewed Hope Agenda for real sector development, is giving impetus to the word Kakistocrats, which is defined as “system by the worst, least qualified or unscrupulous citizen”. 

This description aptly fits the present situation in the Raw Materials Research Development Council (RMRDC) which has been embroiled in numerous contraventions ranging from the allegations of lack of the constitutional provision to the position of Director General levelled against Professor Martin Ike-Munso, an economist and technical adviser to the Hon Minister of Innovation, Science and Technology (FMIST). A matter serious enough to attract the attention of the National Assembly, which lead to the setting up of an investigative panel on the qualifications and appropriateness of the appointees of some key Agencies of the Ministry, such as the Raw Materials Research Development Council (RMRDC) National Space Research Development Agency (NASRDA) and Energy Commission of Nigeria ECN. All of which are presently allegedly headed by unqualified cronies of the Hon Minister, who himself is embroiled in accusations of certificate forgery.  it is quite instructive that neither the Hon Minister nor the invited Director Generals honoured the invitation of the investigative panel of the House of Representatives, clearly raising questions of the forces who are protecting them. 

While the issue of his qualification is still raging,  a document from a civil society group calling the attention of the Office of the Senate President, Speaker House of Representatives, Bureau of Public Procurement, (BPP)  EFCC, Up speaking the urgent action arresting the reckless and non-adherence to all the provisions of the Procurement Act, 2022 and the Financial Regulations 2009 on the awards of contracts for both goods and services amounting to approximately N 292, 555,462.50 by the Director General/CEO of Raw Materials Research Development Council (RMRDC) Professor Martin Nnanyelugo Ike-Muonso within the short period of his assumption of office from 21st May 2024-Date. The document listed the Awards of contracts totalling over N300,000,000.00 to 3 companies namely, Chriscord Integrated Services for the supply of 33,000 litres of diesel amounting to N61,050,000, Supply of Furnitures at RMRDC HQ for Director Generals Office Phase 1 & 2 awarded to JKANT Limited, amounting to N89, 741,000, Renovation of the Director Generals Office at RMRDC Headquarters Abuja awarded to JKANT, amounting to N99,501,462.50 and the provision of cleaning services at the RMRDC Headquarters Abuja Awarded to Fichee Facilities Limited, amounting to 42,263,000

The document showed proof that in awarding the listed contracts, the Director General did not adhere to the approved demands as;

(i) There was no procurement planning as required by law, the Procurement Planning Committee (PPC) of the council did not meet nor has any PPC meeting been held in the council since the assumption of office of the Director General on the 21st of May, 2024

(ii) There was no tenders board meeting as required by law and none of the contracts were captured in the 2023/2024 budget of the council

(iii) the required “No Objection to contract award “was neither sought nor gotten from the Bureau of Public Procurement

(iv) No advertisements or publications in Tenders Journal as required to ensure competitive bidding was done by the council before the awards

(v) Full payments have been authorized and made to the contractors even as the jobs are yet to be completed

It also   listed the specific sections of both the Public Procurement Act ,2007 and Financial Regulations, that the DG breached in the awards of the listed contracts as,  

i. subsections,   16 (1)(b), (c), (g),  which states that all public procurement  shall be conducted “based only on procurement plans supported by prior budgetary appropriations and no procurement proceedings shall be formalized until the procuring entity has ensured that funds are available to meet the obligations and subject to the threshold in the regulations made by the Bureau, has obtained   a “Certificate of ‘No Objection’ to Contract Award” from the Bureau, by open competitive bidding and in accordance with the procedures and timeline laid down in this Act and as may be specified by the Bureau from time to time 

ii. Section 5 subsection 17(a)(i); the approving authority for the conduct of public procurement in the case of a government agency, parastatal, or corporation, shall be a Parastatals Tenders Board. 

iii. Section 5 subsection 18(e), (g); “a procuring entity shall plan its procurement by integrating its procurement into its yearly budget. It shall ensure the procurement entity functions as stipulated in the Act are carried out by the procurement planning committee.”

iv. Section 5 subsection 19(a) (d) (h): “A procuring entity shall, in implementing its procurement plans, advertise and solicit for bids in adherence to the Act and guidelines and obtain approval of the approving authority before making an award, and obtain a “Certificate of ‘No Objection’ to Contract Award” from the Bureau “

v. Subsections 21 and 22: For each financial year each procuring entity shall establish a Procurement Planning Committee. The Tenders Board shall be responsible for the award of procurements of    goods, works and services within the threshold set in the regulations

vi. Chapter 7, section 708 states that “on no account should payment be made for services not yet performed or for goods not yet supplied”.

Further scrutinization of the documents provided shows glaring administrative errors, such as the stamp acknowledging receipt of the proposal showing that the proposal was submitted and received in the council by the 10th of June, 2024; Minutes by the DG show that he approved quotation on the 6th June 2024; PPC Memo on the contract was raised on 27th May, 2024 (please note that the PPC Memo came before the quotation); the  DGs minutes on the PPC Memo was on the 27th of May 2024 (weeks before the quotation was submitted; an award of contract letter is dated 30th May, 2024 (this means also that the contract was awarded before the quotation)  and so much more, it behoves on the listed agencies to rise to this occasion and unravel this shenanigan as speedily as possible

Abolition Of State, LGA Joint Acct. Stakeholders Commend Supreme Court Judgement

 

Some stakeholders in both public and judicial sectors have described the abolition of the state and Local Government joint account by the Supreme Court as a welcome development.

They said this while reacting to the apex court’s judgment which held that henceforth all Local Government Area allocations should be paid directly to them from the federation account.

Justice Emmanuel Agim who led a seven-man panel of the justices of the Supreme Court had given the judgment in a suit filed by the federal government against the 36 state governors.

The court barred the 36 governors from receiving, tampering with or withholding funds meant for the local government

The governors were also barred from henceforth dissolving democratically elected officials for local governments and that doing so would amount to a breach of the 1999 Constitution.

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Mohammed Ndarani, said the judgment will bring absolute, unadulterated, uncompromised, unmediated and unmitigated LGA in tandem with President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda.

“The joint account had made the local government areas an appendage of state governments, and stultified and frustrated the progress which ought to have been made by the LGA councils.

“The funds meant for the development of the areas were simply collated and shared by the actors at the regular joint accounts allocation committee meetings of each state.

“This has caused the erosion of accountability as these local government council leaderships complain of having little or nothing left after the state governments have starved them of all funds meant for development.

“In the process they are left with paltry amounts which the leadership end up squandering too, and nobody holds them accountable.

“Now with this judgment, there is a need to institute serious and comprehensive checks and balances on the spending and performances of these local governments to ensure that the dividends of democracy trickle down to all and sundry.

Chief Peter Ameh, the National Secretary of the Coalition of United Political Parties (CUPP) said the judgment will promote accountability and make elected LGA Chairmen accountable for funds received.

“And if such funds are mismanaged then they can now be invited by the EFCC and other anti-corruption agencies to render account.

“CUPP totally agrees with the Supreme Court that state governors have constituted themselves as dangerous species to the development of democracy in Nigeria, especially as it relates to the management of local government funds.

“They will now allow state INEC the free hand to conduct free and fair elections as the appointment of caretaker committees is now illegal and unconstitutional.

“By this judgment, the suffering masses have been freed financially from the shackles of the governors who have been holding them hostage since 1999 as a result of their warped interpretation of section 162(6) of the 1999 constitution as amended.

“We hope that the financial autonomy granted to the local governments will be the first step to the devolution of powers.

“We want every component state to see the need to think out of the box, go to work, and stop this monthly beggarly allocation by the states to local governments.

“All states have what it takes to survive on its own and become self-sufficient in the generation of resources, if the political will is given a priority”, he said.

Mr Osita Okechukwu, former Director-General, Voice of Nigeria (VON) rated the judgment as an iconic judgment which clearly will restore grassroots democracy in Nigeria.

“To me, the iconic judgment was pure and simple; it will restore grassroots democracy in Nigeria from emperor-governors.

“Today’s judgment has also restructured our local government system; therefore I call on all to monitor and ensure the prudent management of the 20.6 per cent federal revenue allocation to local government councils’’.

He hailed the justices for the restoration of Nigerian’s collective interest in democracy at the grassroots level and the reinforcement of section 7 of the 1999 constitution of the federal republic of Nigeria.

Okechukwu regretted that for 25 years the emperor-governors have violently breached section 7 of the constitution by brazen rigging of local council elections, and by extension mismanagement of the 20.6 per cent local government funds; hence dampening the development of grassroots democracy.

“I salute the Attorney General of the federation, Lateef Fagbemi SAN for the excellent suite which is a signpost for renewal of our hope in grassroots democracy via the temple of justice system.

“Especially when all efforts made in the past 25 years to grant financial autonomy to local government councils via the amendment of the constitution were blocked by these governors’’.

Okechukwu also urged Nigerians to henceforth rise up and monitor the 20.6 per cent federal allocation to all local government areas.

NAN reports the Supreme Court granted full financial autonomy to the 774 local governments in the country.

The seven-member panel in a unanimous decision outlawed the appointment of caretaker committees to administer the local governments by state governors.

The panel also declared that it was illegal and unconstitutional for governors to continue to receive or retain funds allocated to the local councils, under State and Local Government Joint Account.

The court delivered the landmark judgment in suit: SC/CV/343/2024, filed by the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) against the 36 state governors.

The federal government also urged the court to issue an order prohibiting state governors from embarking on unilateral, arbitrary and unlawful dissolution of democratically elected local government leaders.

Besides, the Federal Government prayed to the Supreme Court for an order, stopping governors from further constituting caretaker committees to run the affairs of local governments, against the constitutionally recognised and guaranteed democratic system.

It equally applied for an order of injunction, restraining the governors, their agents and privies, from receiving, spending or tampering with funds released from the Federation Account for the benefit of local governments when no democratically elected local government system is put in place in the states.

The apex court held that it is illegal and unconstitutional for governors to continue to receive and seize funds allocated to the benefit of LGAs in their states.

According to the court, the “dubious practice” which has gone on for over two decades, is a clear violation of Section 162 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.

In its lead judgment delivered by Justice Emmanuel Agim, the Supreme Court further held that no House of Assembly of any state has the power to make laws that could in any manner, grant governors the right to interfere with statutory allocations meant for the council areas.

Stressing that the law mandated that LGAs must be governed by democratically elected officials, the Supreme Court ordered that forthwith, funds meant for councils must be directly paid to them from the federation account.